Neu, Taylor and Ocampo (“School District Deficits and Program Spending in Alberta,” Canadian Journal of Education Administration and Policy, June 2002) have observed that the funding formula contains a number of structural biases that produces disparities in the fiscal positions of boards. For example, inadequate funding for special education, English as a second language (ESL) and technology has forced boards to subsidize these programs by taking money from other areas of the budget. Because demands for special education and ESL are not uniform, boards serving populations having a high proportion of students requiring these programs are consistently disadvantaged.
Friday, May 6, 2011
Funding Public Education
Interesting background information on education funding in the province can be found in the article, "Funding Public Education: An excerpt from the Association's submission to Alberta's Commission on Learning," which currently appears on the ATA Web Extras' page. The following sheds some light on the challenges of large urban metro boards like Calgary's that have a higher proportion of ESL and Special Needs students (several years of no funding increases, some ESL targeted funding eliminated):
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment